Top Ten Reasons Why People Do Not Have Estate Plans (And Why They Are Wrong)

 

  1. They Don’t Want to Talk About Their Death.

 

Many people understandably do not like talking about their own immortality, let alone their preferences with respect to burial, cremation, and organ donation.  Sensitive topics can be very difficult to discuss for some, and not so difficult for others.  However, difficult topics such as end of life decisions are best addressed by these people themselves.  Difficult decisions should not be delegated to family members or friends who may or may not know the persons true wishes or concerns about their end of life decisions. Having a comprehensive estate plan and legally binding documents unambiguously demonstrates a person’s true intent, wishes and concerns about these difficult decisions.  An estate plan will spare your family from making difficult end of life decisions that may or may not be your true intent.  So not talking about and having an estate plan in place to address your death is a recipe for disaster.

 

 

  1. They Are Not Old Enough.

 

Another reason people do not have an estate plan is because they feel that they are not “old enough” to have an estate plan.  I tell these people that they are wrong because once a person is 18 and legally an adult, he or she should have some form of an estate plan in place in the event of their incompetence or untimely death.   I have seen and heard of many 18 year old involved in accidents where the hospital cannot disclose medical information to his or her parents.  An individual can suffer from a sudden heart attack, or slip and fall, or some disease that will render him or her incapacitated.  If one is rendered incapacitated without an estate plan in place, then the end results is usually a lengthy and expensive court process called a conservatorship.  With respect to death, we all will die sooner or later.  However, the million dollar question is when?  You could die tomorrow, two weeks from now, or 50 years from now–no one knows.  Dying without an estate plan or dying intestate usually results in a lengthy and expensive court process called a probate.   So, once a person is an adult, he or she should have some kind of an estate plan.

 

 

  1. They Don’t Have Sufficient Assets To Warrant An Estate Plan.

 

Too many people falsely believe they do not have sufficient assets to create an estate plan, and that estate planning is only for the wealthy.  Having an “estate” does not mean you own an ostentatious mansion on a hill in the country side.  An estate is basically all assets a person owns at the time of his or her death.   Assets such as bank accounts, vehicles, homes, retirement accounts, and life insurance are all part of the estate, or gross estate, legally speaking. Planning your “estate” simply means what assets go to whom.   In other words, your final wishes are carried out in accordance with your wishes.

 

 

  1. Estate Planning Costs Too Much.

 

Creating a comprehensive estate plan can cost anywhere from two to four thousand dollars, and is cost prohibitive for some people.  However, having a comprehensive estate plan in place can save a substantial amount of money because it will help avoid a conservatorship (if incapacitated) and/or probate (if deceased); both lengthy and costly court proceedings.   For example, if a person is rendered incapacitated or dies without an estate plan in place, then generally speaking, their money or their estate will likely incur unnecessary expenses and fees and dissemination of private family information to the public.  A comprehensive estate plan can save a person or their estate a substantial amount of money in the end.

 

 

  1. They Never Thought About Estate Planning.

 

Have you ever thought about thermodynamics?   I have not.  But I heard of it before somewhere.  And no, I will not attempt to explain thermodynamics, a very important subject that applies to everyone.  The point is that many very important subjects are never really given much thought, or given no thought at all.  Estate planning is one of these very important subjects that far too many people simply ignore until it’s too late.

 

 

  1. They Will Create Their Estate Plan In The Future.

 

Humans procrastinate!  This is not a news flash.  When it comes to estate planning, many people know they need an estate plan, yet they never get around to actually creating one.  Many people tell themselves that they will create their estate plan eventually, i.e., they procrastinate.  Sadly, many Californians are rendered incapacitated and die every day, irrespective of age and health.  Tomorrow is never guaranteed for any of us.  So, people should stop procrastinating about estate planning and actually create their estate plan before their time is up.

 

 

  1. Creating An Estate Plan Will Take Too Much Time.

 

Contrary to public belief, creating an estate plan can be created and implemented in a few short weeks, and sooner in urgent matters.  Overall, the process begins with the prospective client filling out a questionnaire about the client’s family history, assets, and liabilities.  Then the client and estate planning attorney meet to discuss the creation the estate plan.  Then the estate planning attorney will prepare a draft estate planning documents for the client to review.  If the drafts meet with the client’s approval, then the client and attorney meet for a signing ceremony where the estate planning documents are executed in final and notarized.   The whole estate planning process is relatively quick process.

 

 

  1. Estate Planning Will Create The Proverbial Trust Fund Baby.

 

Paris Hilton is arguably the most famous (or infamous) “trust fund baby” in California.  Many affluent parents choose not to leave their wealth to their children because of the Paris Hilton “trust fund baby” syndrome.   Many parents fear that their children will turn into unmotivated trust fund babies who don’t know the value of a dollar. In fact, billionaires Warren Buffett and Bill Gates have publicly stated that they will not leave their wealth to their children for this very reason.  Obviously, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are not my clients (I wish they were though).  Estate planning does not turn your children into trust fund babies, so to speak.  I tell my clients that it is your money, you can distribute it as you see fit.  Many of my trust contain language that incentive children to achieve positive results before they are entitle to a trust distribution.  It is the old dangle the carrot trick.  By way of example, a beneficiary will earn 1/3 of their assets when he or she earns a four year degree from an accredited university or attains the age of 25, whichever occurs first.  This encourages the child to go to college and earn a four-degree as a condition to receiving a distribution of the trust.   A competent estate planning attorney will have a plethora of incentive provisions to prevent the proverbial trust fund baby syndrome.

 

 

  1. They Believe That Estate Planning is Not Important.

 

Many Californians, in particular Marin County residents, believe that estate planning is not important.  This is simply not true.  Estate planning is important because it protects a person, and his or her family, and assets in the event of incapacity or death.

 

 

  1. People Simply Do Not Know the Benefits of Estate Planning.

 

The benefits of estate planning are substantial.  Bu way of example, an estate plan can nominate guardians for minor children in the event that the parents are no longer able to take care of their minor children.   Estate planning can also save a substantial amount in taxes, whether estate tax or income tax.  As previously mentioned, estate planning can avoid conservatorship and probate proceedings.  These are only some examples on why estate planning is very important.

 

Matthew W. Harris is a Marin County estate planning attorney located in San Rafael.  For more information about estate planning or any other questions regarding estate planning, please contact The Law Office of Matthew W. Harris today for a free consultation at (415) 521-5610.

 

Note:  Attorney advertising.  Nothing posted on this blog by the Law Office of Matthew W. Harris, a Marin County estate planning attorney, is intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice.   Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation.  Nor does any comment on a blog post create an attorney-client relationship. The presence of hyperlinks to other third-party websites does not imply that the Law Office of Matthew W. Harris, endorses those websites, their contents, or the activities or views of their owners.

Reasons to Avoid Probate

 

Avoid Probate In MarinProbate Is Open To The Public

 

Both probate documents and proceedings are open to the public.  This means that any person or business agent can go to the courthouse and review (and copy) the court probate file and personally attend probate court-hearings. In a probate matter, a deceased person’s estate (money, property and debts) and personal family information is available for the whole world to see.   In fact, many appraisal companies review new probate case files looking for new clients. Sadly, the executor or personal representative of the deceased’s estate will receive cold-calls from appraisal companies during these often difficult times.  Lastly, potentially embarrassing or sensitive family information could be disseminated to the public.

 

 

Probate Can Be Expensive

 

A probate proceeding can be outright expensive depending on various factors such as the size and complexity of the estate.  Moreover, attorneys’ fees, executor fees, probate referee fees, and court filing fees can be expensive and substantially reduce the amount of the deceased’s estate.  In other words, the deceased’s ultimate beneficiaries (usually family members) can substantially receive less property (money) because of the expended attorneys’ fees, executor fees, probate referee fees, and filing fees.

 

 

Probate Can Take A Long Time.

 

The legal world is full of probate horror stories of probate cases contentiously lasting several years. In California, an average probate case ranges from 8 to 12 months.  Again, this is an average probate case. If the probate case is complex, and throw-in an overcrowded and underfunded probate court, the probate case will usually last longer than a year.

 

 

Creditors

 

A probate matter may cause the deceased’s creditors to come out of the woodwork. A personal representative or executor of the deceased’s estate must give notice to all known creditors of the deceased.  Many of these creditors may file a creditor’s claim against the estate causing the estate to be reduced and perhaps causing a contested issue in the probate matter.

  1. Joint Tenancy Property

 

Upon the death of a joint tenant, the real property passes to the surviving joint tenant by operation of law.   However, the surviving joint tenant must take certain steps to terminate the joint tenancy title so that record title is held in the name of the surviving joint tenant.  With respect to income tax, only the decedent’s portion of the joint tenancy property receives a step-up in basis.

 

 

  1. Community Property With Right of Survivorship

 

Upon the death of a married person holding title to real property, the entire real property passes to the surviving spouse.  The surviving spouse will then own the real property as his or her sole and separate property.  With respect to income tax, the property will receive a full step-up in basis, as opposed to joint tenancy, which only receives a half step-up in basis.

 

 

  1. Multiple Party Accounts

 

The California Multiple-Party Accounts Law governs accounts with more than one signatory at financial institutions.  A Multiple-Party Account can be: (1) Joint Account-an account payable on request to one or more of two or more parties; (2) P.O.D. Account-an account payable upon the account holder’s death to certain beneficiaries; (3) Totten Trust Account-an account in the name of one or more parties as trustee for one or more beneficiaries.

 

 

  1. Life Estates

 

If the decedent held property as a life tenant with specified remainderman, then the decedent’s interest terminates upon death and the property interest passes to the remainderman without the necessity of probate.

 

 

  1. Contracts

 

Generally speaking, certain instruments such as a life insurance policy, contract of employment, bond, mortgage, promissory note, pension plan, IRA, that direct money or benefits be paid to certain beneficiaries upon the death of the account holder, is valid even if it does not comply with the requirements for execution of a will; i.e., the transfer of money and benefits avoids necessitating a probate.

 

Matthew W. Harris is a Marin probate attorney located in San Rafael, California.  For more information on probate, please contact The Law Office of Matthew W. Harris today at (415) 521-5610 for a free probate consultation.

Note:  Attorney advertising.  Nothing posted on this blog by the Law Office of Matthew W. Harris, is intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice.  Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation.  Nor does any comment on a blog post create an attorney-client relationship.  The presence of hyperlinks to other third-party websites does not imply that the Law Office of Matthew W. Harris, endorses those websites, their contents, or the activities or views of their owners.

Harris Family 2015

I am sending you this important legal advisory about estate planning, a critically important topic that applies to every California adult.  Simply put, too many California adults do not have an estate plan in place in the event of their untimely incapacity or death. This means that far too many California adults and their families (including pets) are not protected.

Life is short, incapacity cases are on the rise, and death is certain.  So what are YOU doing about it?   Did you know that if you:

Life is both precious and unpredictable.  At the Law Office of Matthew W. Harris, we provide individualized attention to our clients, couples, and their families by creating customized comprehensive estate planning packages.  A typical estate plan package contains the following instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Law Office of Matthew W. Harris provides free estate planning consultations.  If you or a loved one needs a personalized comprehensive estate plan, call the Law Office of Matthew W. Harris at (415) 521-5610, or please feel free to stop by at 55 Mitchell Boulevard, Suite 15, San Rafael, California 94903.

What is a No-Contest Clause?

 

A no-contest clause is a provision in a will or trust that, if enforced, would penalize a beneficiary if the beneficiary files a contest with the probate court.  In other words, a no-contest clause provides that a beneficiary will lose his or her inheritance in the estate plan if he or she seeks to invalidate or impair the estate plan documents or any of its provisions.

 

 

Why Do Estate Plan Documents Contain No-Contest Clauses?

 

A no-contest clause is designed to discourage litigation by an unhappy beneficiary.  The no-contest clause requires the beneficiary to choose between accepting the gift provided in the estate plan and pursuing a claim that is a contest and perhaps possibly losing his or her entire inheritance.

 

 

What Is The Current California Law on No-Contest Clauses?

 

The California law on no-contest clauses changed dramatically in 2010.  A discussion on the former no-contest clauses and former accompanying case law is beyond the scope of this blog.  This blog will discuss the current California law on no-contest clauses (i.e., instruments that became irrevocable on or after January 1, 2010).

Generally speaking, no-contest clauses are governed by three different enforcement statutes.  The applicable statutes will depend on the date that the instrument at issue became irrevocable (i.e., on the death of the creator of the will or trust instrument).

Wills or trusts that became irrevocable on or after January 1, 2010, are governed by California Probate Code §§21310-21315.  Under the current law, no-contest clauses are greatly restricted.  In fact, a no-contest clause “shall only be enforced” against contests that are within the three types:

a.  Direct contests brought without probable cause.  A direct contest means a contest that alleges the invalidity of a protected instrument based either on fraud, lack of due execution, lack of capacity, menace, duress, fraud, or undue influence…  Probable cause exists if, at the time of filing a contest, the facts known to the contestant would cause a reasonable person to believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that the requested relief will be granted after an opportunity for further investigation or discovery. California Probate Code §21311(b).

b.  Challenges to certain property transfers if expressly barred by the no-contest clause.  A no-contest clause may be enforced against a pleading to challenge a transfer of property on the grounds that it was not the transferor’s property at the time of the transfer, but only if the no-contest clause expressly provides for that application.  California Probate Code §21311(a)(2).

c.  Filing or prosecution of creditor’s claim if expressly barred by the no-contest clause.  A no-contest clause may be enforced against the filing of a creditor’s claim or prosecution of an action based on the claim, but only if the no-contest clause expressly provides for that application.

 

If an instrument contains a no-contest clause, a beneficiary and his or her attorney should review the penalty for triggering the no-contest clause.  If the penalty is insubstantial (e.g. beneficiary will receive a $2,000 inheritance) and the chance of recovery is great (e.g., a $1 million inheritance), the beneficiary may want to assume this risk and contest the instrument.  On the other hand, if the inheritance is substantial (e.g., a $1 million inheritance) and the chances of prevailing on the contest is low to moderate, then the beneficiary has a tough decision to make; take the money or perhaps lose it all if he or she contests.  It will of course depend on the facts and circumstances of each case.

 

Matthew W. Harris is a Marin County estate planning, conservatorship, and probate attorney located in San Rafael, California.  For more information on estate planning, conservatorship or probate, please contact The Law Office of Matthew W. Harris today at (415) 521-5610 for a free consultation.

 

Note:  Attorney advertising.  Nothing posted on this blog by the Law Office of Matthew W. Harris, a Marin County estate planning attorney, is intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice.  Blog postings and hosted comments by The Law Office of Matthew W. Harris are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation.  Nor does any comment on a blog post by The Law Office of Matthew W. Harris create an attorney-client relationship.  The presence of hyperlinks to other third-party websites does not imply that the Law Office of Matthew W. Harris endorses those websites, their contents, or the activities or views of their owners.

The Law Offices of Matthew W. Harris is pleased to announce that Marin County’s very own, Matthew W. Harris, Esq,,earned his LL.M (Master of Laws) degree in Estate Planning, Trust & Probate Law from Golden Gate University School of Law.  GGU is the only law school in the Western United States that offers such an LL.M in Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Law.

 

ggu LLM ESTATE PLANNING

Matthew W. Harris, Esq., LL.M assists clients with estate planning, probate, conservatorship, and trusts and estates disputes.   The Law Offices of Matthew W. Harris is conveniently located in Marin County, and City of San Rafael.  Matthew W. Harris serves San Francisco County, Marin County, Sonoma County, Alameda County and Contra Costa County.

Please call Matthew W. Harris, Esq., LL.M., the Marin County estate planning, conservatorship and probate attorney you want to see.

Probate is the court administration of transferring the decedent’s estate to certain beneficiaries.  If a decedent dies with a will, then this person is deemed to have died testate.  If the decedent died without a will, then the decedent is deemed to have died intestate.

In a Marin County Probate, a fiduciary is appointed by the court as personal representative of the decedent’s estate.  The personal representative will have to ascertain and collect the decedent’s assets to protect the interests of the decedent’s creditors. The personal representative will have to arrange for the timely payment of debts and taxes of the decedent.

Once the decedent’s estate and liabilities are ascertained and properly credited, then the decedent’s estate is ready for distributions to his or her designated beneficiaries (if there is a will) or to his or her legal heirs (if there is no will).

A Marin County Probate administration can range from easy to extremely complex. Matthew W. Harris, Esq. LL.M offers free probate consultations.

Matthew W. Harris, Esq., a Marin County Probate attorney, is conveniently located in Marin County, and the City of San Rafael.

Thank you for visiting my page. Best wishes.

 

Matthew W. Harris Attorney San Rafael Probate Elder Law WIls Trusts Estates
Marin County Probate Attorney

San Rafael Probate Attorney

 

On April 21, 2016, Prince suddenly died. The official cause of his death has not been released. But much media speculation surrounds his use and addiction to prescribed medication. To make matters worse, ostensibly Prince died without a will, or “intestate” as it is called in California.

Many of my clients and family members asked me whether I was surprised that Prince died without a will, as it has been reported in the media.  Much to their surprise I was not really surprised at all about Prince dying without a will.

I cannot honestly recall the number of excuses I hear from people on why they never got around to creating a basic will or a comprehensive estate plan. The most common excuses are: (1) people are young so they will create an estate plan later on in life; (2) People do not have a “large enough estate” to warrant implementing an estate plan; (3) hiring an estate planning attorney is too expensive; (4) certain people do not want to confront their own immortality; and (5) certain people never really stop to think about creating their estate plan.

If Prince truly died without a will or estate plan of any kind, then results are going to be tragic.  First, Prince’s heirs will have to be determined.  Sadly, there is a gentleman in jail who claims he is Prince’s son and is demanding that a DNA test be conducted. Second, Prince’s debts will have to be ascertained.  In fact, it has also been reported that certain of Prince’s employees, friends or agents will file claims against his estate for money.

Like any true artists, their fame and value increase exponentially after they die.  It has been reported that Prince had an estimated $300 million dollar estate at the time of his death, which will now skyrocket.  With all this money and the uncertainty of heirs and creditors, a perfect storm is brewing in Prince’s estate.

San Rafael Probate attorney Matthew W, Harris, Esq., LL.M  assists individuals and families during the emotional and legal aspects of probate in Marin County.  Matthew W. Harris, Esq., LL.M. offers free probate consultations. Call  the Law Offices of Matthew W. Harris at (415) 521-5610.  Thank you for visiting my blog.

Marin County Estate Planning Attorney

 

Many Baby Boomers are in the difficult position of taking care of their elderly parents. And millions of Baby Boomers are inching closer to their own golden years. It is no secret that America is aging rapidly. With the ever increasing aging population, many have responsibly created revocable living trusts to protect themselves from their potential incapacity and ultimate death. Many of these trust instruments nominate a successor trustee to step in the shoes of an incapacitated trustee.

Incapacity is an elusive term.  To begin with, every adult person is presumed to have capacity unless he or she has been determined by the court to be “incapacitated.”  A determination of incapacity must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. As a result, an incapacity determination for a fading or diminished trustee can be very difficult to prove.

Many elderly trustees can exhibit behavior indicative of diminished or fading capacity. This problem can be further compounded when the elderly trustee denies that he or she may have capacity issues and refuses to resign as trustee. Such a fading trustee of a large estate can cause a substantial amount of damage (i.e., loss of money or property).  Obviously, a fading trustee’s amicable resignation is by far the best approach.

On the other hand, if a trustee with fading capacity refuses to resign, then he or she may be removed according to the terms of the trust instrument.  A well drafted trust should grant one or more persons the power to remove a trustee, for specified reasons or on specified contingencies. By way of example, many standard trust provisions require two doctor declarations stating that the trustee is incompetent to handle his or her financial affairs.

A trustee may be removed by a court order pursuant to California Probate Code, section 17200. A trustee may be removed under Cal. Probate Code, section 15642, if it is determined that the trustee is substantially unable to manage the trust’s financial resources or is otherwise substantially unable to properly execute the duties of office, or the trustee is substantially unable to resist fraud or undue influence.

Marin County estate planning attorney Matthew W, Harris, Esq., LL.M assists individuals dealing with a diminished or fading capacity trustee.  Mr. Harris offers free trust administration consultations.

Call the Law Offices of Matthew W. Harris at his San Rafael office at (415) 521-5610.  Thank you for visiting.

To better understand trust administration, one must have a general understanding of a revocable living trust.  To begin with, a revocable living trust is a popular estate planning device used by many responsible individuals to avoid a court imposed conservatorship (incapacity) or a court imposed probate (death).  With a revocable living trust, assets are administered during an individual or couples lifetime, and during his or her potential incapacity, and then ultimately distributed at his or death to the beneficiaries designated by the trust.

Most individuals who create these trusts name themselves as the initial trustees.  Usually these trusts name close family members or close friends to serve as successor trustees of the trust.  Unfortunately, many of these family members or friends do not know what the job of being a trustee truly entails.

A trustee is a fiduciary, meaning that he or she is held to a very high standard when managing trust assets on behalf of the beneficiaries.  A trustee has many duties that he or she owes to the beneficiary(ies) of the trust.  A trustee also has many powers in administering the trust.  The duties and powers of a trustee are well beyond the scope of this blog.

Administering a trust can be extremely complex.  The Law Offices of Matthew W. Harris provides legal representation to trustees who need assistance with trust administration.  Mr. Harris, Esq., LL.M provides free trust administration consultations. The Law Offices of Matthew W. Harris is located in the County of Marin, and City of San Rafael, and serves clients throughout the San Francisco Bay area.

Thank you for visiting our blog!